Introduction
The latest research into magnetism gives a generally accepted equation for g (a value related to the magnetic field strength) as being equal to the ratio to angular momentum to magnetic momentum. I have not found an explanation of the underlying theory for this and I presume that there is none but that the value for g agrees with observation and maintains a constant value.
If the angular momentum and magnetic momentum (for say iron) is constant and therefore the magnetic field strength does not fluctuate it suggests that these circular paths are both fixed by different poles.
This in turn suggests two distinct and separate processes happening at the same time.
I am proposing here that mass to energy exchange is responsible for angular momentum and that that energy to mass exchange is responsible for magnetic momentum.
Separating the V wave Processes
In figure “V wave 1” the equation 2y = e^(x^2) + e^(- x^2) represents the V wave and two combined processes.
In figure “Magnetic Momentum 1” the equation 2y = e^(x^2) - e^(- x^2) represents the effect of separating the mass to energy interactions it contains. Unfortunately the desired equation is 2y = e^(x) - e^(- x).
The first equation restricts us to using real values but now we can take complex values in the second equation.
In figure “Magnetic Momentum 2” the equation 2y = e^(x) - e^(- x) should follow the surface of a sphere.
If we consider this as representing the angular distance between the two different paths for angular momentum and magnetic momentum then I would anticipate that they had a tangential difference. The equation y = tan x does not match the first equation but does demonstrate a tangential trend. This may actually work to our advantage if we are looking for a reason for the creation of two sets of poles. Perhaps this difference at x=1 reflects this imbalance.
I would assume that the equation 2y = e^(x) - e^(- x) does not follow the surface of a sphere exactly it may create an egg like shape that resolves itself by the creation of two sets of poles.
Conclusion
There is a basis here for taking a new approach to magnetism and viewing it as the result of mass to energy interactions trying to balance themselves.
The path around the surface of an electron for wave that is mainly energy (energy wave) should follow the mass to energy exchange and is responsible for angular momentum.
The path around the surface of an electron for wave that is mainly matter (matter wave) should follow the energy to mass exchange and is responsible for magnetic momentum.
Originally I viewed these operations upon the electron as converting all the mass but now I believe that is unnecessary. Even a small discrepancy between these two processes should be enough to fix two independent paths. If you consider a spinning top it is very easy to disrupt it’s balance.
The most important factors are that both these two processes should be stable, regular, balanced, and predictable.
